4.5 Article

Use of dual mTOR inhibitor MLN0128 against everolimus-resistant breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 170, Issue 3, Pages 499-506

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4779-x

Keywords

MTOR inhibitors; MLN0128; Everolimus; AI resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Panda Charitable Foundation
  2. National Cancer Institute [P30CA033572]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA033572] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HR+/HER2- aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer can be treated with everolimus and a second AI until the cancer recurs. Targeting these everolimus-resistant patients with the latest standard of care, CDK4/6 inhibitors, has not been clearly addressed. Understanding the signaling transduction pathways, which everolimus resistance activates, will elucidate the mechanisms and offer treatment strategies of everolimus resistance. To mimic the clinical setting, letrozole-resistant cells were used to generate an everolimus-resistant model (RAD-R). Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) was performed to reveal changes in the signaling transduction pathways, and expression levels of key proteins were analyzed. Inhibitors targeting the major signaling pathways, a CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and a mTORC1/2 inhibitor (MLN0128), were evaluated to establish resistance mechanisms of RAD-R. RPPA results from RAD-R indicated changes to significant regulatory pathways and upregulation of p-AKT expression level associating with everolimus resistance. MLN0128, that inhibits the AKT phosphorylation, effectively suppressed the proliferation of RAD-R cells while treatment with palbociclib had no effect. Among the many signaling transduction pathways, which are altered post everolimus resistance, targeting dual mTORC1/2 is a possible option for patients who have recurrent disease from previous everolimus treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available