4.6 Article

Altered functional network connectivity in preterm infants: antecedents of cognitive and motor impairments?

Journal

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
Volume 223, Issue 8, Pages 3665-3680

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-018-1707-0

Keywords

Premature infant; Neonatal; Brain; Imaging; Connectivity; fMRI

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [5R01-NS094200] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS096037, R01 NS094200] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Very preterm infants (31weeks gestational age) are at high risk for brain injury and delayed development. Applying functional connectivity and graph theory methods to resting state MRI data (fcMRI), we tested the hypothesis that preterm infants would demonstrate alterations in connectivity measures both globally and in specific networks related to motor, language and cognitive function, even when there is no anatomical imaging evidence of injury. Fifty-one healthy full-term controls and 24 very preterm infants without significant neonatal brain injury, were evaluated at term-equivalent age with fcMRI. Preterm subjects showed lower functional connectivity from regions associated with motor, cognitive, language and executive function, than term controls. Examining brain networks using graph theory measures of functional connectivity, very preterm infants also exhibited lower rich-club coefficient and assortativity but higher small-worldness and no significant difference in modularity when compared to term infants. The findings provide evidence that functional connectivity exhibits deficits soon after birth in very preterm infants in key brain networks responsible for motor, language and executive functions, even in the absence of anatomical lesions. These functional network measures could serve as prognostic biomarkers for later developmental disabilities and guide decisions about early interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available