4.6 Article

Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulation of corticospinal excitability by targeting cortical I-waves with biphasic paired-pulses

Journal

BRAIN STIMULATION
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 322-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.014

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Short-interval intracortical facilitation; Indirect wave; Biomedical engineering; Motor cortex

Funding

  1. State Research Funding, Kuopio, Finland [5041726, 5041730, 5041749]
  2. Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki Finland
  3. Paivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, Helsinki, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced I-wave behavior can be demonstrated at neuronal population level using paired-pulses and by observing short-interval cortical facilitation (SICF). Advancements in stimulator technology have made it possible to apply biphasic paired-pulses to induce SICF. Objective: Our aim was to characterize the SICF I-wave interaction by biphasic paired-pulses with the ultimate objective to enhance TMS effects via SICF in various TMS-applications. Methods: We used biphasic paired-pulses in 15 volunteers to characterize corticospinal SICF using various 1.2-8.0ms inter-stimulus intervals, and measuring SICF input-output response. Results: SICF interaction with the first I-wave (I1) was observed in the output responses (motor evoked potentials; MEPs) in all subjects. Most subjects (>= 80%) also exhibited later SICF I-wave interaction. SICF at I1 was present at all applied intensities below 140% of resting motor threshold. At I2, we observed SICF only with intensities just above motor threshold. Conclusions: Biphasic paired-pulses can reliably induce SICF shown by the facilitatory I-wave interaction, and could therefore be applied with repetitive bursts to enhance responsiveness to TMS. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available