4.5 Article

Pepper with and without a sting: Brain processing of intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimuli from the same source

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1700, Issue -, Pages 41-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.07.010

Keywords

Trigeminal stimuli; Olfactory stimuli; Black pepper; Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany [DFG 441/18-1]
  2. Takasago Europe Perfumery Laboratory, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans have distinct and overlapping brain regions for the processing of intranasal olfactory or trigeminal stimuli. It may be assumed that trigeminal stimulants and trigeminal-free odorous stimuli from the same source are processed differently in the human brain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), this study investigated the question whether the black pepper (Piper nigrum) derived trigeminal active compound piperine and the trigeminal-free pepper essential oil (pepperEO) are processed in relation to their degree of trigeminal stimulation. Twenty-one young healthy adults underwent a fMRI scan where piperine and pepperEO were delivered orthonasally using an olfactometer. Ratings for intensity, irritability, and pleasantness of each stimulus were obtained at the end of the scanning session. Results showed brain activation of the trigeminal network in response to piperine, and olfactory-related areas in response to pepperEO. PepperEO induced larger activations in the trigeminal network as compared to piperine. This was possibly due to the associative learning for the pungent sensations of pepperEO. In addition, conjunction analyses showed that the secondary somatosensory area, insula, and thalamus were involved in the processing of both piperine and pepperEO. In conclusion, the results strongly suggest that the cerebral representations of trigeminal irritants can be evoked by learned associations. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available