4.2 Article

A novel mutation in sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase causing congenital brain malformation

Journal

BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 480-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.02.008

Keywords

Congenital brain malformation; Cerebellar hypoplasia; Sphinaosine-1-phosphate lyase; Next generation sequencing

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany [CI 218/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Recently recessive mutations in sphingosine-l-phosphate lyase (SGPLI) have been published as a cause of syndromic congenital nephrotic syndrome with adrenal insufficiency. We have identified a case with fetal hydrops and brain malformations due to a mutation in SGPLI. Case report: We report a patient presenting with severe fetal hydrops, congenital nephrotic syndrome and adrenal calcifications. MRI imaging showed generalized cortical atrophy with simplified gyral pattern and hypoplastic temporal lobes as well as cerebellar hypoplasia and hyperintensity in the pons. The boy deceased at 6 weeks of age. Via whole exome sequencing, we identified a novel homozygous frameshift mutation c.1233delC (p.Phe4llLeufs*56) in SGPLI. Conclusion: In our patient, we describe a novel mutation in sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase (SGPLI) leading to severe brain malformation. Neurodevelopmental phenotypes have been reported earlier, but not described in detail. To this end, we present a review on all published SGPLI-mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations focusing on neurodevelopmental outcomes. We hypothesized on the severe neurological phenotypes, which might be due to disruption of neuronal autophagy. Mutations in SGPLI shall be considered in the differential diagnosis of fetal hydrops as well as congenital brain malformations and neuropathies. (C) 2018 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available