4.6 Article

Prevalence of hepatitis E virus infection in wild boars from Spain: a possible seasonal pattern?

Journal

BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1377-4

Keywords

Hepatitis E; Wild boar; Prevalence; Seasonality; Foodborne

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad integrated in the Plan Nacional de I + D + I [RD12/0017/0012]
  2. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion
  3. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  4. Fundacion para la Investigacion en Salud (FIS) del Instituto Carlos III [PI16/01297]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has been shown that wildlife can serve as natural reservoirs of hepatitis E virus (HEV). The wild boar (Sus scrofa) is probably the main natural reservoir of HEV and could therefore represent an important route of transmission in Europe, especially in regions where game meat is widely consumed. We evaluated the prevalence of HEV infection in wild boar in the south of Spain, with the aim of identifying associated risk factors. A cross-sectional study that included hunted wild boar was carried out during the 2015/2016 hunting season (October 15 to February 15) in Andalusia (southern Spain). The outcome variable was HEV infection, defined as amplification of HEV RNA in serum by RT-PCR. Results: A total of 142 animals, selected from 12 hunting areas, were included and formed the study population. Thirty-three wild boars (23.2%; 95% CI: 16.8%-30.7%) were positive for HEV infection. Prevalence peaked in October and November, then gradually declined until the end of December. After multivariate analysis, only hunting date was independently associated with HEV infection across sex and age. Conclusions: Our study found a relatively high prevalence of HEV infection in wild boar in the south of Spain, suggesting that prevalence may depend on the season when the animal is hunted. In consequence, the potential risk of zoonotic transmission could fluctuate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available