4.7 Article

Financing the civic energy sector: How financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 5-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.004

Keywords

Civic energy sector; Institutional economics; Energy transitions; Energy ownership

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. ESRC [ES/K006576/1, ES/F028180/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/F028180/1, ES/K006576/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the relations between financing institutions and more local ownership structures for energy provision. This research defines municipal and civil society structures involved in energy provision as the 'Civic Energy Sector'. It argues that the financial institutions of nations are key enabling institutions for this sector to contribute to a low carbon energy transition. The path of development of these financial institutions helps to shape the ownership structures and technology choices of energy systems and futures in different nations. This paper presents findings from case analysis comparing the United Kingdom's latent civic energy sector, with the expansion of this sector in Germany. Using an institutional economics framing, the paper demonstrates the importance of the German local banking sector in facilitating civic ownership structures in that country. In contrast, the neo-liberal, market-led financial institutions in the UK, reinforce energy pathways less reliant on civic ownership models. Hence, the forms of low carbon energy transition being pursued in these countries are constrained by path dependence of institutions both within and beyond the energy sector. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available