4.8 Article

A holistic framework for building critical infrastructure resilience

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 21-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005

Keywords

Crisis management; Critical Infrastructures; Resilience; Resilience policies; Delphi process; Case studies

Funding

  1. European Commission's Directorate-General of Justice, Freedom and Security as part of the European CIPS strategic objective [JLS/2008/CIPS/024]
  2. European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The welfare of society is more and more dependent on the proper functioning of Critical Infrastructures (CIs), and crises that affect CIs usually aggravate their impact on society. Therefore, improving the resilience of CIs is the most important objective of today's crisis managers. Although several resilience frameworks can be found in the literature, their implementation is still incipient and detailed prescriptions for their implementation are lacking. Moreover, some frameworks are only limited to describing the activities performed within the boundaries of the CI, neglecting the role of external agents. This research describes a practical and holistic resilience framework for improving the resilience of CIs taking into account the external agents. The framework is composed of three elements: a set of resilience policies; an influence table that assesses the influence of policies on prevention, absorption and recovery stages; and an implementation methodology that defines the temporal order in which the policies should be implemented. Two empirical studies were undertaken in two CIs to implement this framework. The studies show that the resilience framework helps CIs to diagnose their resilience level, detect areas of potential improvement and complement their risk management approach with a transversal approach to be better prepare to deal with crises. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available