Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality
Julia L. Han et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2017)
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse
Jared M. Campbell et al.
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH (2017)
Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology
J. Wasiak et al.
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME (2017)
Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health
J. Wasiak et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2016)
Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: a systematic review
Xin Yin Wu et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2016)
No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials
Xiaobo Xie et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2015)
Financial conflicts of interest and their association with outcome and quality of fibromyalgia drug therapy randomized controlled trials
Winnie K. Pang et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2015)
Anterior vs. Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Brendan T. Higgins et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2015)
Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties
Dawid Pieper et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature from 1998 to 2012
Katherine Corbyons et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2015)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications following the posterior and lateral surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty
J. R. Berstock et al.
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND (2015)
Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty
Wiebe C. Verra et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2015)
Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Geert Peersman et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2015)
Rotating-platform TKA No Different from Fixed-bearing TKA Regarding Survivorship or Performance: A Meta-analysis
Joseph T. Moskal et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2014)
Surgical Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Midvastus and Subvastus to the Medial Peripatellar Approach
Hong-Wei Liu et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Standard Versus Mini-Incision Posterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty
James R. Berstock et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
Imageless Computer Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Superior Short Term Functional Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Brett A. Rebal et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
Patellar Denervation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing and Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Tao Li et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
Padhraig S. Fleming et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Mobile bearing or fixed bearing? A meta-analysis of outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing bilateral total knee replacements
Zhan-dong Bo et al.
KNEE (2014)
Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ning Li et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2014)
Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers
Hongchuan Wang et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2014)
Total Hip Replacement for the Treatment of End Stage Arthritis of the Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alexander Tsertsvadze et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Will gender-specific total knee arthroplasty be a better choice for women? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiaobo Xie et al.
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (2013)
Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers
Lisa Hartling et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Hand Surgery: An Analysis Using AMSTAR
Arash Momeni et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2013)
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales
Mark Oremus et al.
BMJ OPEN (2012)
The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews
Alison Booth et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)
Reporting of Conflicts of Interest in Meta-analyses of Trials of Pharmacological Treatments
Michelle Roseman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2011)
An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
Patrick Sequeira-Byron et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE (2011)
Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology
Luis H. Braga et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2011)
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
S. N. Papageorgiou et al.
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH (2011)
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
Andreas Stang
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
David Moher et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2010)
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
Hilda Bastian et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2010)
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study
Jin Wen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses
Sergio Sismondo
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2008)
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography
Simon Sanderson et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty - A qualitative and systematic review of the literature
O Ethgen et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2004)
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials - A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
B Als-Nielsen et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
L McAuley et al.
LANCET (2000)
Share Paper
