Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Are You In or Are You Out?! Moral Appeals to the Public in Organ Donation Poster Campaigns: A Multimodal and Ethical Analysis
Solveig L. Hansen et al.
HEALTH COMMUNICATION (2018)
All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms
Linnea I. Laestadius et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2017)
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results
J. Scott Roberts et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS (2017)
Feeling Is Believing: Evaluative Conditioning and the Ethics of Pharmaceutical Advertising
Paul Biegler et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY (2016)
Beyond clinical utility: The multiple values of DTC genetics
Mauro Turrini et al.
APPLIED AND TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS (2016)
Ethical Limitations on the State's Use of Arational Persuasion
Nadia N. Sawicki
LAW & POLICY (2016)
The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study
Deanna Alexis Carere et al.
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS (2015)
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review of European Guidelines, Recommendations, and Position Statements
Muhammad Rafiq et al.
GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS (2015)
Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing
D. L. Boeldt et al.
CLINICAL GENETICS (2015)
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
Eline M. Bunnik et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2015)
Filling in the Gaps: Priming and the Ethics of Pharmaceutical Advertising
Paul Biegler
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL (2015)
INFORMED CONSENT IN DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER PERSONAL GENOME TESTING: THE OUTLINE OF A MODEL BETWEEN SPECIFIC AND GENERIC CONSENT
Eline M. Bunnik et al.
BIOETHICS (2014)
Variations in predicted risks in personal genome testing for common complex diseases
Rachel R. J. Kalf et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2014)
Use of Genetic Tests among Neurologists and Psychiatrists: Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, and Needs for Training
Melissa Salm et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2014)
23andMe and the FDA
George J. Annas et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2014)
The Peltzman effect and compensatory markers in medicine
Vinay Prasad et al.
HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION (2014)
Nonpropositional Content in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Advertisements
Pascal Borry et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2013)
Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising
Paul Biegler et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2013)
State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation
Paula Saukko
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY (2013)
Survey of European clinical geneticists on awareness, experiences and attitudes towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Heidi Carmen Howard et al.
GENOME MEDICINE (2013)
Debating the clinical utility of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility
Pascal Borry et al.
ADDICTION (2012)
Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries
Pascal Borry et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2012)
Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
Glyn Elwyn et al.
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2012)
Informed Choice in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing (DTCGT) Websites: A Content Analysis of Benefits, Risks, and Limitations
Amanda Singleton et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2012)
It's Not Like Judgment Day: Public Understanding of and Reactions to Personalized Genomic Risk Information
Erynn S. Gordon et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2012)
Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research Participants
S. E. Gollust et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS (2012)
The General Public's Understanding and Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results
J. W. Leighton et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS (2012)
The Use of Persuasion in Public Health Communication: An Ethical Critique
John Rossi et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS (2012)
Misuse (and abuse?) of the concept of empowerment. The case of online offer of predictive direct-to-consumer genetic tests
Loredana Covolo et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH (2012)
S2-Guideline Human Genetic Diagnostic
M. Stuhrmann-Spangenberg et al.
MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK (2011)
Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States
Melanie F. Myers
GENOME MEDICINE (2011)
Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories
Yeyang Su et al.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS (2011)
Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics
Sandra Soo-Jin Lee et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2009)
What is ideal genetic counselling?: A survey of current international guidelines
Elina Rantanen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2008)
Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Predictive Medical Genetic Tests: Assessment of Current Practices and Policy Recommendations
Yuping Liu et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING (2008)
Individual responsibility and solidarity in European health care
Ruud Ter Meulen et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY (2008)
Five misunderstandings about case-study research
B Flyvbjerg
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY (2006)
Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing
SE Gollust et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Individual responsibility for health - Decision, not discovery
SD Yoder
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT (2002)
Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling
G Elwyn et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS (2000)
Ethical considerations in support of the marketing of public health issues
ML Rothschild
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR (2000)
Share Paper
