4.7 Article

Fouling and cleaning of high permeability forward osmosis membranes

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 161-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.12.007

Keywords

Forward osmosis; Critical flux; Organic fouling; Osmotic backwash

Funding

  1. National Centre of Excellence in Desalination Australia
  2. Australian Government through the National Urban Water and Desalination Plan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study critically assesses the fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) when operating with new generation of high permeability commercial thin film composite (TFC) FO membranes. Low fouling behavior, commonly accepted in FO with the membrane active layer facing the fouling feed solution (AL-FS), is demonstrated to be mainly the consequence of operating at a low permeation flux (typically lower than 10 Lm(-2) h(-1)). A higher water flux is observed to lead to severe fouling when using high permeability novel TFC membranes. Advanced membrane surface characterisation and FO fouling experiments over a range of initial fluxes (5-17 Lm(-2) h(-1)) demonstrate that the intense fouling behavior of high permeability TFC membranes is mainly connected to the initial flux, whereas membrane surface properties only play a minor role. Like for any membrane processes, it is demonstrated that a (so-called critical) flux can be defined in FO systems operated in AL-FS, above which stable operation cannot be maintained over an extended period of time. At higher flux, the fouling cake deposed on the active layer creates additional hydraulic resistance to filtration and consequently significant flux decline is observed over time. A typical anti-fouling strategy, such as high cross flow velocity cleaning, is not efficient to sustain high flux, but fouled membranes can be successfully cleaned using extended osmotic backwashing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available