4.2 Article

Healthcare quality and safety: a review of policy, practice and research

Journal

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 198-215

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12391

Keywords

quality; safety; human factors; social factors; sociology; socio-cultural

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands
  3. ESRC [ES/L000776/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L000776/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10145] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last two decades healthcare quality and safety have risen to the fore of health policy and research. This has largely been informed by theoretical and empirical ideas found in the fields of ergonomics and human factors. These have enabled significant advances in our understanding and management of quality and safety. However, a parallel and at time neglected sociological literature on clinical quality and safety is presented as offering additional, complementary, and at times critical insights on the problems of quality and safety. This review explores the development and contributions of both the mainstream and more sociological approaches to safety. It shows that where mainstream approaches often focus on the influence of human and local environment factors in shaping quality, a sociological perspective can deepen knowledge of the wider social, cultural and political factors that contextualise the clinical micro-system. It suggests these different perspectives can easily complement one another, offering a more developed and layered understanding of quality and safety. It also suggests that the sociological literature can bring to light important questions about the limits of the more mainstream approaches and ask critical questions about the role of social inequality, power and control in the framing of quality and safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available