4.7 Article

Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management, and rice yield

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 72-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.011

Keywords

Dry-seeded rice; Puddled transplanted rice; Dry cultivation; Weed management; Herbicides

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lower water availability coupled with labor shortage has resulted in the increasing inability of growers to cultivate puddled transplanted rice (PTR). A field study was conducted in the wet season of 2012 and dry season of 2013 to evaluate the performance of five rice establishment methods and four weed control treatments on weed management, and rice yield. Grass weeds were higher in dry-seeded rice (DSR) as compared to PTR and nonpuddled transplanted rice (NPTR). The highest total weed density (225-256 plants m(-2)) and total weed biomass (315-501 gm(-2)) were recorded in DSR while the lowest (102-129 plants m(-2) and 75-387 gm(-2)) in PTR. Compared with the weedy plots, the treatment pretilachlor followed by fenoxaprop plus ethoxysulfuron plus 2,4-D provided excellent weed control. This treatment, however, had a poor performance in NPTR. In both seasons, herbicide efficacy was better in DSR and wet-seeded rice. PTR and DSR produced the maximum rice grain yields. The weed-free plots and herbicide treatments produced 84-614% and 58-504% higher rice grain yield, respectively, than the weedy plots in 2012, and a similar trend was observed in 2013. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available