4.7 Article

LIGHT-CURVE ANALYSIS OF NEON NOVAE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 816, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/26

Keywords

novae, cataclysmic variables; stars: individual (QU Vul, V351 Pup, V382 Vel, V693 CrA, V1974 Cyg)

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K05289, 15K05026, 24540227] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyzed light curves of five neon novae, QU Vul, V351 Pup, V382 Vel, V693 CrA, and V1974 Cyg, and determined their white dwarf (WD) masses and distance moduli on the basis of theoretical light curves composed of free-free and photospheric emission. For QU. Vul, we obtained a distance of d similar to 2.4 kpc, reddening of E (B - V) similar to 0.55, and WD mass of M-WD = 0.82-0.96 M. This suggests that an oxygen-neon WD lost a mass of more than similar to 0.1 M. since its birth. For V351. Pup, we obtained d magnitudes 5.5 kpc, E(B-V) similar to 0.45, and M-WD = 0.98-1.1 M-circle dot. For V382. Vel, we obtained d similar to 1.6 kpc, E(B-V) similar to 0.15, and M-WD = 1.13-1.28 M-circle dot.For V693 CrA, we obtained d similar to 7.1 kpc, E(B-V) similar to 0.05, and MWD = 1.15-1.25 M-circle dot. For V1974. Cyg, we obtained d similar to 1.8 kpc, E(B-V)similar to 0.30, and M-WD = 0.95-1.1 M-circle dot. For comparison, we added the carbon-oxygen nova V1668. Cyg to our analysis and obtained d similar to 5.4 kpc, E(B-V) similar to 0.30, and M-WD = 0.98-1.1 M-circle dot. In QU Vul, photospheric emission contributes 0.4-0.8 mag at most to the optical light curve compared with free-free emission only. In V351. Pup and V1974. Cyg, photospheric emission contributes very little (0.2-0.4 mag at most) to the optical light curve. In V382 Vel and V693 CrA, free-free emission dominates the continuum spectra, and photospheric emission does not contribute to the optical magnitudes. We also discuss the maximum magnitude versus rate of decline relation for these novae based on the universal decline law.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available