4.6 Article

Interaction mechanism of doxorubicin and SWCNT: protonation and diameter effects on drug loading and releasing

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 314-322

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra20866a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institute of Health [SC3GM105576, SC3GM082324]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work the adsorption of doxorubicin (DOX) on the surface of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as well as its encapsulation in SWCNTs, and their dependence on the protonation of the NH2 group of DOX, solvent, and the diameter of armchair (n, n) SWCNTs were systematically investigated using theoretical methods such as PM6-DH2 and M06-2X in the scheme of OMIOM. It was found that the two loadings, adsorption on the sidewall of CNTs and encapsulation in CNTs, have distinct solvent, protonation and diameter dependences. The encapsulation is much stronger than the adsorption of DOX on the sidewall of CNTs, and the former also has significantly higher solvent and protonation effects than the latter. The adsorption primarily occurs through pi-pi stacking and just becomes slightly stronger as the diameter of the CNTs increases, while besides the pi-pi stacking the additional C-H/N-H/O-H center dot center dot center dot pi and C=O center dot center dot center dot pi also contribute to the encapsulation of DOX in CNTs. It seems that (8, 8) CNT with a diameter of similar to 11 angstrom is energetically an onset for the encapsulation, since the encapsulation turns from endothermic to exothermic when the diameter is larger than approximately 11 angstrom, and the optimal diameter for the encapsulation is 14 angstrom corresponding to (10, 10) CNT. Thus for the thick CNT the encapsulation may also play an important role in the loading and releasing for the CNT-based drug delivery system of the DOX.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available