4.0 Article

Treatment-naive Gaucher disease patients achieve therapeutic goals and normalization with velaglucerase alfa by 4 years in phase 3 trials

Journal

BLOOD CELLS MOLECULES AND DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 153-159

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.10.007

Keywords

Gaucher disease; Normalization; Therapeutic goal; Velaglucerase alfa

Categories

Funding

  1. Shire International GmbH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gaucher disease is an inherited metabolic disease characterized by beta-glucocerebrosidase deficiency and commonly treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The efficacy of ERT with velaglucerase alfa was assessed based on the achievement of published therapeutic goals and the normalization of disease parameters in 39 treatment-naive patients with type 1 Gaucher disease, 6 to 62 years of age, enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials. After 4 years of ERT, therapeutic goals for thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly had been achieved in 100% of patients; goals for anemia and hepatomegaly had been achieved in 95% and 94% of patients, respectively. Consistent with the goal for bone mineral density, lumbar spine bone density improved in 87% of patients >= 18 years of age. At year 4, compared with clinical ranges for healthy individuals, 86% of patients with a low baseline hemoglobin concentration had normalized, 60% with a low baseline platelet count had normalized, 67% with baseline splenomegaly had normalized, 58% with hepatomegaly had normalized, and lumbar spine bone density had normalized in 53% of adults. The decade-old therapeutic goals do not reflect the potential for normalization of clinical parameters in ERT-treated patients. Goals consistent with normalization or near-normalization should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00430625, NCT00553631, NCT00635427. (C) 2016 Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available