4.7 Article

Single-agent ibrutinib in treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a 5-year experience

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 131, Issue 17, Pages 1910-1919

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-810044

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [R01 CA197870, R01 CA183444, R01 CA177292, R35 CA197734]
  3. D. Warren Brown Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported durable responses and manageable safety of ibrutinib from a 3-year follow-up of treatment-naive (TN) older patients (>= 65 years of age) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). We now report on long-term efficacy and safety with median follow-up of 5 years in this patient population with TN (N = 31) and R/R (N = 101) CLL/SLL. With the current 5-year follow-up, ibrutinib continues to yield a high overall response rate of 89%, with complete response rates increasing over time to 29% in TN patients and 10% in R/R patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in TN patients. The 5-year PFS rate was 92% in TN patients and 44% in R/R patients. Median PFS in R/R patients was 51 months; in those with del(11q), del(17p), and unmutated IGHV, it was 51, 26, and 43 months, respectively, demonstrating long-term efficacy of ibrutinib in some highrisk subgroups. Survival outcomes were less robust for R/R patients with del(17p) and those who received more prior therapies. The onset of grade >= 3 cytopenias, such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, decreased over time. Treatment-limiting adverse events were more frequent during the first year compared with subsequent periods. These results demonstrate sustained efficacy and acceptable tolerability of ibrutinib over an extended time, providing the longest experience for Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with CLL/SLL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available