4.7 Article

BAFF and CD4+ T cells are major survival factors for long-lived splenic plasma cells in a B-cell-depletion context

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 131, Issue 14, Pages 1545-1555

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-789578

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ANR PRTS
  2. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe labelisee)
  3. Fondation Princesse Grace
  4. European Research Council Advanced Grant (Memo-B)
  5. Societe de Medecine Interne (Bourse Marcel Simon)
  6. Poste d'Accueil INSERM
  7. Societe de Medecine Interne (Bourse CSL-Behring)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous data have suggested that B-cell-depletion therapy may induce the settlement of autoreactive long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in the spleen of patients with autoimmune cytopenia. To investigate this process, we used the AID-CreERT2-EYFP mouse model to follow plasma cells (PCs) engaged in an immune response. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction at the single-cell level revealed that only a small fraction of splenic PCs had a long-lived signature, whereas PCs present after anti-CD20 antibody treatment appeared more mature, similar to bone marrow PCs. This observation suggested that, in addition to a process of selection, a maturation induced on B-cell depletion drove PCs toward a long-lived program. We showed that B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and CD41 T cells play a major role in the PC survival niche, because combining anti-CD20 with anti-BAFF or anti-CD4 antibody greatly reduce the number of splenic PCs. Similar results were obtained in the lupus-prone NZB/W model. These different contributions of soluble and cellular components of the PC niche in the spleen demonstrate that the LLPC expression profile is not cell intrinsic but largely depends on signals provided by the splenic microenvironment, implying that interfering with these components at the time of B-cell depletion might improve the response rate in autoimmune cytopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available