4.6 Article

Sequential processing with fermentative Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis and chemolithoautotrophic Cupriavidus necator for converting rice straw and CO2 to polyhydroxybutyrate

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages 1624-1629

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26578

Keywords

biorefinery; Caldicellulosiruptor; CO2 fixation; Cupriavidus necator; fermentation; lignocellulose

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21676279]
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2014AA021905]
  3. US National Science Foundation [CBET-1264052]
  4. Key Research and Development Projects of Hainan Province, China [ZDYF2016205]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Biological Resources Service Network [ZSYS-015]
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1264052] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unpretreated rice straw was fermented by the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis, generating solubilized carbohydrates, organic acids, lignin-derived aromatics, H-2, and CO2, which were subsequently used to produce polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) by the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Cupriavidus necator. The fermented liquid significantly enhanced the growth of C. necator, leading to a five-fold cell biomass yield, and a nine-fold PHB yield compared to what was obtained from conventional mineral media. This integrated process utilized all products of lignocellulose fermentation without H (electron) loss and carbon emission, while concomitantly enhancing CO2 fixation by C. necator for PHB production. The sequential coupling of C. kronotskyensis and C. necator provides not only a new biorefinery paradigm characterized by reduced pretreatment and saccharification requirements but also an efficient way for enhancing CO2 fixation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available