4.7 Review

Advances in kinome research of parasitic worms - implications for fundamental research and applied biotechnological outcomes

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 915-934

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.02.013

Keywords

Kinases; Kinomes; Parasitic worms; Bioinformatics; Curation; Biotechnology

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC), Australia
  3. Wellcome Trust, UK
  4. Australian Academy of Science, Australia
  5. Australian-American Fulbright Commission, Australia
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany
  7. Melbourne Water Corporation, Australia
  8. Melbourne Bioinformatics Platform, Australia
  9. WormBase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein kinases are enzymes that play essential roles in the regulation of many cellular processes. Despite expansions in the fields of genomics, transcriptomics and bioinformatics, there is limited information on the kinase complements (kinomes) of most eukaryotic organisms, including parasitic worms that cause serious diseases of humans and animals. The biological uniqueness of these worms and the draft status of their genomes pose challenges for the identification and classification of protein kinases using established tools. In this article, we provide an account of kinase biology, the roles of kinases in diseases and their importance as drug targets, and drug discovery efforts in key socioeconomically important parasitic worms. In this context, we summarise methods and resources commonly used for the curation, identification, classification and functional annotation of protein kinase sequences from draft genomes; review recent advances made in the characterisation of the worm kinomes; and discuss the implications of these advances for investigating kinase signalling and developing small-molecule inhibitors as new anti-parasitic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available