4.6 Article

Green growth and climate change: conceptual and empirical considerations

Journal

CLIMATE POLICY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 165-177

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.992003

Keywords

climate change; decoupling; dependence on growth; environmental Kuznets curve; green growth

Funding

  1. EU's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [290647]
  2. 'National Excellence Programme - Elaborating and operating an inland student and researcher personal support system convergence programme' key project
  3. EU and Hungary
  4. European Social Fund [TAMOP 4.2.4.A/2-11-1-2012-0001]
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of green growth is studied in the context of climate change. As carbon emissions are easier to quantify than many other types of environmental pressure, it will be possible to reach a more definite conclusion about the likelihood of green growth than has been possible in the long-standing historical debate on growth versus the environment. We calculate the rate of decoupling between gross domestic product (GDP) and GHG emissions needed to achieve internationally agreed climate targets. Next, eight arguments are considered that together suggest that fast decoupling will be very difficult. Subsequently, we examine the main lines of research used by proponents of green growth to support their viewpoint, including theoretical arguments, exercises with integrated assessment models, and studies of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. It will be concluded that decoupling as a main or single strategy to combine economic and environmental aims should be judged as taking a very large risk with our common future. To minimize this risk we need to seriously consider reducing our dependence on growth. This requires a fundamental change of focus in both economic research and policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available