4.8 Article

Membrane fouling mechanism of biofilm-membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR): Pore blocking model and membrane cleaning

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages 398-405

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.036

Keywords

Biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR); Filtration performance; Membrane fouling; Blocking model; Membrane cleaning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371473, 21476050]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [2017A030310540]
  3. Guangdong provincial education department Youth Innovative Talents Project [17ZK0110]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Guangdong University of Technology [220413582]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) is considered as an important wastewater treatment technology that incorporates advantages of both biofilm and MBR process, as well as can alleviate membrane fouling, with respect to the conventional activated sludge MBR. But, to be efficient, it necessitates the establishment of proper methods for the assessment of membrane fouling. Four Hermia membrane blocking models were adopted to quantify and evaluate the membrane fouling of BF-MBR. The experiments were conducted with various operational conditions, including membrane types, agitation speeds and transmembrane pressure (TMP). Good agreement between cake formation model and experimental data was found, confirming the validity of the Hermia models for assessing the membrane fouling of BF-MBR and that cake layer deposits on membrane. Moreover, the influences of membrane types, agitation speeds and transmembrane pressure on the Hermia pore blocking coefficient of cake layer were investigated. In addition, the permeability recovery after membrane cleaning at various operational conditions was studied. This work confirms that, unlike conventional activated sludge MBR, BF-MBR possesses a low degree of membrane fouling and a higher membrane permeability recovery after cleaning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available