4.8 Article

Cr(III) removal from synthetic and industrial wastewaters by using co-gasification chars of rice waste streams

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 266, Issue -, Pages 139-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.054

Keywords

Char; Cr(III) removal; Gasification; Rice waste streams

Funding

  1. FEDER through the Operational Program for Competitive Factors of COMPETE
  2. Portuguese funds through FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology) [PTDC/AAG-REC/3477/2012 - RICEVALOR, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027827]
  3. FCT/MTCES
  4. QREN
  5. COMPETE
  6. FEDER
  7. Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BPD/93407/2013, SFRH/BD/101751/2014, UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  8. ERDF under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007265]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/QUI/50006/2013, PTDC/AAG-REC/3477/2012, SFRH/BD/101751/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blends of rice waste streams were submitted to co-gasification assays. The resulting chars (G1C and G2C) were characterized and used in Cr(III) removal assays from a synthetic solution. A Commercial Activated Carbon (CAC) was used for comparison purposes. The chars were non-porous materials mainly composed by ashes (68.3-92.6% w/w). The influences of adsorbent loading (solid/liquid ratio - S/L) and initial pH in Cr(III) removal were tested. G2C at a S/L of 5 mg L-1 and an initial pH of 4.50 presented an uptake capacity significantly higher than CAC (7.29 and 2.59 mg g(-1), respectively). G2C was used in Cr(III) removal assays from an industrial wastewater with Cr(III) concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 mg L-1. Cr(III) removal by precipitation (uptake capacity ranging from 11.1 to 14.9mg g(-1)) was more effective in G2C, while adsorption (uptake capacity of 16.1 mg g(-1)) was the main removal mechanism in CAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available