4.8 Article

Bioaugmentation strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of high C/N ratio feedstock with methanogenic enrichment culture

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 261, Issue -, Pages 188-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.069

Keywords

Bioaugmentation; High C/N ratio; Methanogenic propionate-degrading culture; Microbial community

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51708538]
  2. National key research and development program of China [2017FYD0800801]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2013B010204053]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2016A030312007, 2017A030310443]
  5. Bureau of International Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences [182344KYSB20170009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate whether bioaugmentation could improve the digestion performance of high C/N ratio feedstock without co-digestion with nitrogen-rich substrate, different forms of enriched methanogenic culture were introduced to the continuous feed digesters. The performance efficiency of bioaugmentation on digestion improvement was compared. The effect of bioaugmentation on microbial community composition was revealed as well. Results demonstrated that routine bioaugmentation with liquid culture (containing the microbes and the medium remains) showed the best performance, with the organic loading rate (OLR), methane percentage, volumetric methane production (VMP) and volatile solid methane production (VSMP) higher at 1.0 g L-1 d(-1), 24%, 0.22 L L-1 d(-1) and 0.23 L g(-1) VS d(-1) respectively, compared to the non-bioaugmentation control. Whole genome pyrosequencing analysis suggested that consecutive microbial consortium addition could reconstruct the methanogens community by increasing the populations of acetoclastic methanogens Methanothrix, which could accelerate the degradation of acetate and methane production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available