4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Use of magnetic powder to effectively improve the performance of sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) in municipal wastewater treatment

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages 135-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.069

Keywords

Magnetic activated sludge; Sequencing batch reactor; Sludge reduction; Microbial diversity and richness; High-throughput sequencing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408588, 21307093]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017353]
  3. Fund for Science and Technology Development of Pudong [PKJ2014-C12]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M2-201605]
  5. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [14540500600, 16391902000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the effect of adding magnetic powder in the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) on the reactor performance and microbial community. Results indicated that, the magnetic activated sludge sequencing batch reactor (MAS-SBR) had 7.76% and 4.76% higher ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies than that of the conventional SBR (C-SBR). The MAS-SBR also achieved 6.86% sludge reduction compared with the C-SBR. High-throughput sequencing demonstrated that the dominant phyla of both SBRs (present as >= 1% of the sequence reads) were Protebacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Saccharibacteria, Chlorobi, Firmicutes, Actinobactoria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes and unclassified_Bacteria. The relative abundance of Protebacteria and Bacteroidetes simultaneously declined whereas the other 8 phyla increased following the addition of magnetic powder. Adding magnetic powder in the SBR significantly affected the microbial diversity and richness of activated sludge, consequently affecting the reactor performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available