4.8 Article

Paracoccus versutus KS293 adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic denitrification: Insights from nitrogen removal, functional gene abundance, and proteomic profiling analysis

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 260, Issue -, Pages 321-328

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.123

Keywords

Paracoccus versutus; Nitrogen removal; Denitrification genes; Proteomic profiling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408466]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0400706]
  3. Youth Science and Technology Star Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2015KJXX-32]
  4. Young Outstanding Talents in University of Shaanxi Province
  5. Yanta Outstanding Youth Scholar in Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (XAUAT)
  6. Foundation of China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201708610028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel strain KS293 exhibiting excellent aerobic and anaerobic denitrification performance was isolated and identified as Paracoccus versutus KS293. Nitrate nitrogen and total organic carbon could be effectively removed by P. versutus KS293 without nitrite accumulation, whilst 82% and 85% of total nitrogen was converted into gaseous products under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (P > .05), respectively. Based on the ratio of anaerobic to aerobic, relative abundance values were increased 1.41, 1.45, and 2.31 folds for nirS, nosZ, and narG, respectively. A comparison of the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and principal component analysis showed significant differences in proteomic profiles between aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In total, 78 proteins that displayed fluctuations in relative expression were observed. 10 proteins including nitrate reductase, maintenance of cell membrane (To1A), and RNA polymerase-binding transcription factor (DksA) were differentially expressed. These findings demonstrated that P. versutus KS293 was effective for nitrogen removal under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available