4.7 Article

Corporate Sustainable Development: is 'Integrated Reporting' a Legitimation Strategy?

Journal

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 165-177

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1863

Keywords

integrated reporting; sustainability reporting; ESG ratings; sustainable development; communication strategy; legitimacy theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the field of sustainability reporting (SR), the so-called integrated report' (IR) is gaining momentum. In spite of its voluntary nature, a growing number of firms are adopting IR by participating in the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Pilot Programme. Stimulated by concerns on the use of SR as a legitimation strategy, the paper investigates whether the decision to adopt an IR stems from the need to repair legitimacy threats. By showing that IR adopters have significantly higher Bloomberg ESG disclosure ratings relative to non-adopters, we reject the hypothesis of firms adopting IR as a response to a poor rating. Additionally, we show that other proxies of legitimacy pressures (size, leverage, profitability, industry) do not play a role in explaining IR adoption. Overall, our evidence suggests that corporate engagement in IR is not a matter of strategic legitimation. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available