Journal
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 165-177Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1863
Keywords
integrated reporting; sustainability reporting; ESG ratings; sustainable development; communication strategy; legitimacy theory
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the field of sustainability reporting (SR), the so-called integrated report' (IR) is gaining momentum. In spite of its voluntary nature, a growing number of firms are adopting IR by participating in the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Pilot Programme. Stimulated by concerns on the use of SR as a legitimation strategy, the paper investigates whether the decision to adopt an IR stems from the need to repair legitimacy threats. By showing that IR adopters have significantly higher Bloomberg ESG disclosure ratings relative to non-adopters, we reject the hypothesis of firms adopting IR as a response to a poor rating. Additionally, we show that other proxies of legitimacy pressures (size, leverage, profitability, industry) do not play a role in explaining IR adoption. Overall, our evidence suggests that corporate engagement in IR is not a matter of strategic legitimation. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available