4.3 Article

Global Trends in Family Planning Programs, 1999-2014

Publisher

ALAN GUTTMACHER INST
DOI: 10.1363/42e0316

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [AID-OAA-A-10-00067]
  3. ESRC [ES/K007394/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K007394/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT: Since 1972, the Family Planning Effort Index has measured national family planning program activities in developing countries and provided a longitudinal perspective on a standardized set of program characteristics. METHODS: In 2014, experts in 90 developing countries assessed national family planning program effort in four main component areas policies, services, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and access to methods using a standardized questionnaire. Results were compared with previous years'data. RESULTS: Globally, family planning program effort has progressed in all four main component areas. The service component, historically the weakest,was rated lowest of all components in 2014, at 47% of the maximum effort, despite a marked improvement of 7.6 percentage points since 1999. Policies, generally the strongest component, remained the strongest in 2014, with 55% of the maximum score and a 6.7 percentage-point improvement since 1999. Monitoring and evaluation improved the most, by 7.8 percentage points, from 45% to 53%, while access improved more modestly, by 2.7 points, from 49% to 52%. Family planning efforts were generally strongest in Asia and Oceania and generally weakest in Central Asia and Eastern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Global family planning programs have improved consistently over the last few decades, although there is room for further development in all regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available