4.3 Article

The Relationship between 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk Calculated Using the Pooled Cohort Equation and the Severity of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 86-92

Publisher

KOREAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.1.86

Keywords

Non-alcoholic fattyliver disease; Pooled Cohort Equation; Framingham risk score

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We investigated the association between the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) calculated by Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) and Framingham risk score (FRS). Method: A total of 15.913 participants (mean age, 46.3 years) in a health screening program were selected for analysis. The presence and severity of fatty liver was assessed by abdominal ultrasonogram. Subjects who drank alcohol more than three times a week were excluded from the study. Result: Among the participants, 57.6% had no NAFLD, 35.4% had grade], 6.5% had grade II. and 0.5% had grade Ill NAFLD. Mean estimated 10 -year CND risk was 2.59%, 3.93%, 4.68%, and 5.23% calculated using the PCE (P for trend <0.01) and 4.55%. 6.39%. 7.33%. and 7.13% calculated using FRS, according to NAFLD severity from none to severe (P for trend <0.01). The odds ratio for >7.5% estimated CND risk calculated using the PCE showed a higher correlation with increasing severity of NAFLD es en after adjustment for conventional CVD risk factors (1.52, 2.56, 3.35 vs. the no NAFLD group as a reference. P<0.01) compared with calculated risk using FRS (1.65, 1.62, 1.72 vs. no NAFLD group as a reference, P<0.01). Conclusion: In our study of apparently healthy Korean adults, increasing severity of NAFLD showed a higher correlation with estimated 10 -year CVD risk when calculated using the PCE than when calculated using FRS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available