4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of repeated use of ulipristal acetate in uterine fibroids

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 519-527

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.038

Keywords

Repeated intermittent use; ulipristal acetate; uterine fibroid; quality of life; long-term treatment

Funding

  1. PregLem S.A., Geneva, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated 12-week courses of 5 or 10 mg daily of ulipristal acetate for intermittent treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Design: Double-blind, randomized administration of two 12-week courses of ulipristal acetate. Setting: Gynecology centers. Patient(s): A total of 451 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroid(s) and heavy bleeding. Intervention(s): Two repeated 12-week treatment courses of daily 5 or 10 mg of ulipristal acetate. Main Outcome Measure(s): Amenorrhea, controlled bleeding, fibroid volume, quality of life (QoL), pain. Result(s): In the 5- and 10-mg treatment groups (62% and 73% of patients, respectively) achieved amenorrhea during both treatment courses. Proportions of patients achieving controlled bleeding during two treatment courses were >80%. Menstruation resumed after each treatment course and was diminished compared with baseline. After the second treatment course, median reductions from baseline in fibroid volume were 54% and 58% for the patients receiving 5 and 10 mg of ulipristal acetate, respectively. Pain and QoL improved in both groups. Ulipristal acetate was well tolerated with less than 5% of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion(s): Repeated 12-week courses of daily oral ulipristal acetate (5 and 10 mg) effectively control-bleeding and pain, reduce fibroid volume, and restore QoL in patients with symptomatic fibroids. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01629563 (PEARL IV). (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available