4.7 Article

Shallow whole genome sequencing is well suited for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1276-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1144

Keywords

Massive parallel sequencing; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; whole genome amplification; blastocyst biopsy; chromosomal rearrangements

Funding

  1. BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) Ghent University [BOF15/GOA/011]
  2. Hercules stichting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To add evidence that massive parallel sequencing (MPS) is a valuable substitute for array comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) with a resolution that is more appropriate for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in translocation carriers. Design: Study of diagnostic accuracy. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Fifteen patients with a balanced structural rearrangement were included in the study: eight reciprocal translocations, four Robertsonian translocations, two inversions, and one insertional translocation. Intervention(s): Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on 47 blastocysts. Main Outcome Measure(s): In the current study, shallow whole genome MPS on a NextSeq500 (Illumina) and Ion Proton (Life Technologies) instrument was performed in parallel on 47 whole genome amplified trophectoderm samples. Data analyses were performed using the QDNAseq algorithm implemented in Vivar. Result(s): In total, 5 normal and 42 abnormal embryos were analyzed. All aberrations previously detected with arrayCGH could be readily detected in the MPS data using both technologies and were correctly identified. The smallest detected abnormality was a similar to 4.5 Mb deletion/duplication. Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates that shallow whole genome sequencing can be applied efficiently for the detection of numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations in embryos, equaling or even exceeding the resolution of the routinely used microarrays. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available