3.8 Article

Evaluation of right atrial function using right atrial speckle tracking analysis in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 30-38

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12574-015-0270-4

Keywords

Speckle tracking imaging; Pulmonary artery hypertension; Right atrial strain; Right atrial function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), right ventricular pressure overload eventually causes right heart failure (RHF), leading to a poor prognosis. Right atrial (RA) overload and RA dysfunction occur in patients with PAH-complicated RHF. We evaluated RA function using right atrial longitudinal strain (RALS) by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) and investigated the association between RALS and the severity of RHF in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) noninvasively. We performed 2D-STE in 56 PAH patients and 20 normal control subjects. The peak global RALS and peak global RA longitudinal strain rate (RALSR) were analyzed by 2D-STE. Simultaneous right heart catheterization was performed to determine the right atrial pressure (RAP) and cardiac index (CI). Peak global RALS (34.6 +/- A 14.1 vs. 58.3 +/- A 9.9 %, p < 0.0001) and peak global RALSR (2.5 +/- A 1.3 vs. 3.1 +/- A 1.2 s(-1), p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in PAH patients compared with normal controls. There was a significant negative correlation between peak global RALS and RAP (r = -0.8037, p < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between peak global RALS and CI (r = 0.8179, p < 0.0001). Peak global RALSR was also correlated with RAP (r = -0.7308, p < 0.0001) and CI (r = 0.7596, p < 0.0001). RALS and RALSR by 2D-STE were useful for noninvasive evaluation of RA dysfunction and the severity of RHF in patients with PAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available