4.5 Article

Synthesis and evaluation of bifunctional tetrahydroxamate chelators for labeling antibodies with 89Zr for imaging with positron emission tomography

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 899-905

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.01.067

Keywords

Zirconium-89; Tetrahydroxamate chelator; Monoclonal antibody; Molecular imaging; Positron emission tomography

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-148465]
  2. Terry Fox Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two novel bifunctional tetrahydroxamate chelators 3 and 4 were synthesized and evaluated for labeling antibodies with Zr-89 for positron emission tomography imaging. Compared to previously reported tetrahydroxamate chelators 1 and 2 with an iminodiacetamide backbone, 3 and 4 were based on an extended iminodipropionamide and dipropylenetriamine backbone, respectively. Trastuzumab conjugates of 3 and 4 were efficiently labeled with Zr-89 (>95% radiochemical yield). The in vitro plasma stability of Zr-89-4-Trastuzumab and especially Zr-89-3-Trastuzumab was greatly improved over previously reported Zr-89-1-Trastuzumab and Zr-89-2-Trastuzumab, but their demetalation remained higher and faster than Zr-89-deferoxamine (DFO)-Trastuzumab. These observations were confirmed by PET imaging and biodistribution in mice, with significant higher bone uptake for Zr-89-4-Trastuzumab, followed by Zr-89-3-Trastuzumab, and to a lesser extent for Zr-89-DFO-Trastuzumab. Molecular modeling showed that 3 and 4 with an extended backbone could form eight-coordinate Zr-complexes as compared to only seven-coordinate Zr-complexes of 1 and 2. Our data suggest further elongation of linker length between hydroxamate motifs of this class of chelators is needed to reach a better Zr-coordination configuration and improve in vivo stability. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available