4.7 Article

Chiral analogues of (+)-cyclazosin as potent α1B-adrenoceptor selective antagonist

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 3502-3513

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.05.023

Keywords

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor subtypes; alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists; alpha(1B)-Adrenoceptor selective antagonists; (+)-Cyclazosin analogues

Funding

  1. Recordati Industry SpA Milano (Italy)
  2. University of Camerino (Italy)
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R15GM119084]
  4. National Science Foundation [BCS-1039497]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

(+)-Cyclazosin [(+)-1] is one of most selective antagonists of the alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor subtype (selectivity ratios, alpha(1B)/alpha(1A)= 13, alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)= 38-39). To improve the selectivity, we synthesized and pharmacologically studied the blocking activity against alpha(1)-adrenoceptors of several homochiral analogues of (+)-cyclazosin featuring different substituents on the carbonyl or amine groups, namely (-)-2, (+)-3, (-)-4-(-)-8, (+)-9. Moreover, we studied the activity of some their opposite enantiomers, namely (-)-1, (-)-3, (+)-6, and (-)-9, to evaluate the influence of stereochemistry on selectivity. The benzyloxycarbonyl and methyl (4aS, 8aR) analogues (+)-3 and (-)-6 improved in a significant way the alpha(1B) selectivity of the progenitor compound: 4 and 14 time vs. the alpha(1D) subtype and 35 and 77 times vs. the alpha(1A) subtype, respectively. The study confirmed the importance of the hydrophobic cis-octahydroquinoxaline moiety of these molecules for the establishment of interactions with the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors as well that of their (4aS, 8aR) stereochemistry to grant selectivity for the alpha(1B) subtype. Hypotheses on the mode of interaction of these compounds were advanced on the basis of molecular modeling studies performed on compound (+)-3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available