4.3 Article

Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models

Journal

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 616-638

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201600262

Keywords

cluster randomized trial; generalized estimating equation; intraclass correlation coefficient; relative efficiency; working correlation structure

Funding

  1. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA091842]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing interest in conducting cluster randomized trials (CRTs). For simplicity in sample size calculation, the cluster sizes are assumed to be identical across all clusters. However, equal cluster sizes are not guaranteed in practice. Therefore, the relative efficiency (RE) of unequal versus equal cluster sizes has been investigated when testing the treatment effect. One of the most important approaches to analyze a set of correlated data is the generalized estimating equation (GEE) proposed by Liang and Zeger, in which the working correlation structure is introduced and the association pattern depends on a vector of association parameters denoted by rho. In this paper, we utilize GEE models to test the treatment effect in a two-group comparison for continuous, binary, or count data in CRTs. The variances of the estimator of the treatment effect are derived for the different types of outcome. RE is defined as the ratio of variance of the estimator of the treatment effect for equal to unequal cluster sizes. We discuss a commonly used structure in CRTs-exchangeable, and derive the simpler formula of RE with continuous, binary, and count outcomes. Finally, REs are investigated for several scenarios of cluster size distributions through simulation studies. We propose an adjusted sample size due to efficiency loss. Additionally, we also propose an optimal sample size estimation based on the GEE models under a fixed budget for known and unknown association parameter (rho) in the working correlation structure within the cluster.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available