4.3 Article

Improving patient-centered communication of the borderline personality disorder diagnosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 5-9

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1022253

Keywords

Borderline personality disorder; clinician-patient communication; diagnosis; patient-centered

Funding

  1. Holtz Center for Science and Technology Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
  2. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [5T32 HS000032]
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, at the National Institutes of Health by the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison [T32 AT006956]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) has historically been difficult to diagnose, and laden with stigma, leading to a variety of clinical responses to patients who present with symptoms.Aims: (1) To understand how clinicians communicate the diagnosis of BPD with patients. (2) To compare these practices with patient communication preferences. (3) To use patient preferences to evaluate clinician practices.Methods: Semi-structured interviews with mental health care providers and experts (n=32) were compared with patients (n=10) and primary patient-written accounts (n=22). Grounded theory was used to explore causal pathways between clinical practice and patient responses.Results: The majority of clinicians sampled did not actively share the BPD diagnosis with their patients, even when they felt it was the most appropriate diagnosis. The majority of patients wanted to be told that they had the disorder, as well as have their providers discuss the stigma they would face. Patients who later discovered that their diagnosis had been withheld consistently left treatment.Conclusions: Clinicians believed that by not using the BPD label they were acknowledging or sidestepping the stigma of the condition. However, from the perspective of patients, open communication was essential for maintaining a therapeutic relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available