4.7 Article

Predictors of participant retention in infertility treatment trials

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1236-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.001

Keywords

Randomized controlled clinical trial; dropout; logistic regression; retention

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [U10 HD27049, U10 HD38992, U10HD055925, U10 HD39005, U10 HD33172, U10 HD38998, U10 HD055936, U10 HD055942, U10 HD055944, U54-HD29834]
  2. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
  3. General Clinical Research Center Grants [MO1RR10732, C06 RR016499]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify variables associated with retention (or dropout) in infertility clinical trials. Retention of subjects in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) has received considerable attention, but there have been few consistent findings. Design: Secondary analysis of data from RCTs. Setting: Academic medical centers. Patient(s): Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or couples with unexplained infertility, aged 18-40 years. Intervention(s): This study is not an intervention study, but the patients in the original RCTs were treated with any or combination of metformin, clomiphene citrate (CC), letrozole, and gonadotropins. Main Outcome Measure(s): Successful retention versus dropout during the RCTs. Result(s): Race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), insurance coverage, history of smoking, and history of alcohol use were significantly associated with retention whether they were considered in bivariate analyses or a multivariable logistic model. Specifically, white race, higher income, having graduate degrees, normal weight, better insurance coverage, nonsmokers, and those who reported current use of alcohol at the start of the trial, had higher retention rates. Conclusion(s): We identified several additive and persistent predictors of retention that can be used to guide the conduct of RCTs and improve the retention rate. Given the limitation of our association analysis, methodologically sound and theoretically grounded research are warranted so that high quality data can be collected to improve our understanding on the causes of dropout. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available