4.6 Article

A new expert system based on fuzzy logic and image processing algorithms for early glaucoma diagnosis

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 366-377

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.10.009

Keywords

Glaucoma diagnosis; Decision-making system; Ophthalmologic images; Optic nerve head; Image processing; Fuzzy logic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decision-making systems based on images have increasingly become essential nowadays mostly in the medical field. Indeed, the image has become one of the most fundamental tools for both clinical research and sicknesses' diagnosis. In this context, we treat glaucoma disease which can affect the optic nerve head (ONH), thus causing its destruction and leading to an irreversible vision loss. This paper presents a new glaucoma Fuzzy Expert System for early glaucoma diagnosis. Original ONH images are first pretreated using appropriate filters to remove the noise. Canny detector algorithm is then used to detect the contours. Main parameters are then extracted, after having identified elliptical forms of both optic disc and excavation. This operation is performed by using Randomized Hough Transform. Finally, a classification algorithm, based on fuzzy logic approaches, is proposed to determine patients' conditions. Our system is advantageous as far as it takes into consideration both instrumental parameters and risk factors (age, race, family history...) which make an important contribution to the valuable identification of cases suspected to have glaucoma. The proposed system is tested on a real dataset of ophthalmologic images of both normal and glaucomatous cases. Compared with other existing systems, the experimental results show the superiority of the proposed methods. The percentage of good predictions is more than 96%, reaching an improvement of 1-9% over earlier methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available