4.8 Review

Walking the line: The fate of nanomaterials at biological barriers

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 41-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.056

Keywords

Biological barriers; Nano/bio interface; Nanomaterials; Nanosafety; Nanomedicine

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB933401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21320102003, 21277037, 11435002]
  3. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [11425520]
  4. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2013S086]
  5. U.S. Public Health Service Grant [U01CA198846]
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA198846] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological systems have developed an efficient multi-tiered defense system to block foreign substances such as engineered nanomaterials (NMs) from causing damage. In a pathological scenario, the disease itself may also pose additional barriers due to the imbalance between abnormal cells and their surrounding microenvironment, and NMs could behave similarly or differently to classic foreign substances, depending on their unique characteristics. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that govern the fate of NMs against these biological barriers, including the strategies that can be used to shift their fate between access and blockage, become key information for NMs design. In this manuscript, we first describe the biological barriers that NMs may encounter, and further discuss how these biological barrier interactions could shift the fate of NMs between toxicity and therapeutic potential. A list of effects that may influence NMs access at nano/bio interface are presented and discussed, followed by personal insights on the important nano/bio topics that require additional research for a better understanding of NM/biological barrier interactions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available