4.8 Review

Clay nanoparticles for regenerative medicine and biomaterial design: A review of clay bioactivity

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 204-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.024

Keywords

Clay nanoparticles; Nanocomposites; Stem cells; Cytotoxicity; Bioactivity; Cell differentiation

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/L010259/1]
  2. ROCO by BBSRC [BB/1021072/1, BBL00609X/1]
  3. UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Hub [MR/K026682/1]
  4. University of Southampton Rayleigh Studentship
  5. BYK-ALTANA
  6. BBSRC [BB/P017304/1, BB/L00609X/1, BB/L021072/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L021072/1, BB/L00609X/1, BB/P017304/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L010259/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clay nanoparticles, composites and hydrogels are emerging as a new class of biomaterial with exciting potential for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Clay particles have been extensively explored in polymeric nanocomposites for self-assembly and enhanced mechanical properties as well as for their potential as drug delivery modifiers. In recent years, a cluster of studies have explored cellular interactions with clay nanoparticles alone or in combination with polymeric matrices. These pioneering studies have suggested new and unforeseen utility for certain clays as bioactive additives able to enhance cellular functions including adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, most notably for osteogenesis. This review examines the recent literature describing the potential effects of clay-based nanomaterials on cell function and examines the potential role of key clay physicochemical properties in influencing such interactions and their exciting possibilities for regenerative medicine. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available