4.7 Article

Why does GH10 xylanase have better performance than GH11 xylanase for the deconstruction of pretreated biomass?

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 13-16

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.01.007

Keywords

GH10 xylanase; GH11 xylanase; Synergism; Bioconversion; Lignocellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2017HH0047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One approach to improve biomass deconstruction is to formulate a more efficient cellulase cocktail by adding accessory enzymes (e.g. xylanase/LPMO/laccases). Among different xylanases, glycoside hydrolase family 10 endo-xylanase (GH10EX) shows better performance than family 11 endo-xylanase (GH11EX) even though GH11EX has better kinetic activity on various xylan substrates. To better understand this phenomenon, the xylan accessibility of GH10/11 xylanases was assessed on various model and realistic cellulosic substrates and their thermostability was also compared during time course of hydrolysis. It showed that GH10EX had higher accessibility towards the xylan backbone within pretreated biomass, especially for these with higher acetyl group content. Acetyl group removal could greatly intensify the synergistic cooperation between GH11EX and cellulases. Additionally, the higher thermostability of GH10EX appeared to be another reason for its outstanding potential during biomass decomposition. This work provides further insights for engineering better biocatalysts to enhance the economic viability of enzyme based biorefinery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available