Journal
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 411-422Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-018-1270-0
Keywords
Acidic soil; Urease activity; pH buffering capacity; Nitrification; Mitigation strategy; Sub-Saharan Africa
Categories
Funding
- Inter-Graduate School Program for Sustainable Development and Survivable Societies at Kyoto University
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [24228007]
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H06171] Funding Source: KAKEN
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer is underway to increase in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The effect of increasing N rates on ammonia (NH3) volatilization-a main pathway of applied-N loss in cropping systems-has not been evaluated in this region. In two soils (Alfisols, ALF; and Andisols, AND) with maize crop in the East African highlands, we measured NH3 volatilization following urea broadcast at six rates (0-150 kg N ha(-1)) for 17 days, using a semi-open static chamber method. Immediate irrigation and urea deep placement were tested as mitigation treatments. The underlying mechanism was assessed by monitoring soil pH and mineral N (NH4 (+) and NO3 (-)) concentrations. More cumulative NH3-N was volatilized in ALF than in AND at the same urea-N rate. Generally, higher urea-N rates increased proportional NH3-N loss (percent of applied N loss as NH3-N). Based on well-fitted sigmoid models, simple surface urea application is not recommended for ALF, while up to 60 kg N ha(-1) could be adopted for AND soils. The susceptibility of ALF to NH3 loss mainly resulted from its low pH buffering capacity, low cation exchange capacity, and high urease activity. Both mitigation treatments were effective. The inhibited rise of soil pH but not NH4 (+) concentration was the main reason for the mitigated NH3-N losses, although nitrification in the irrigation treatment might also have contributed. Our results showed that in acidic soils common to SSA croplands, proportional NH3-N loss can be substantial even at a low urea-N rate; and that the design of mitigation treatments should consider the soil's inherent capacity to buffer NH3 loss.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available