4.3 Article

Monitoring recovery after earthquakes through the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and ground observations: the case of L'Aquila (Italy)

Journal

CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 115-133

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2015.1029520

Keywords

Disaster recovery; remote sensing; GIS; ground observations; monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team (EEFIT)
  2. Institute of Structural Engineers (ISE) [EEFIT Research Grant]
  3. Afro-Asian institute (AAI)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the GIScience Doctoral College [DK W 1237-N23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The usefulness of remote sensing (RS), geographical information systems, and ground observations for monitoring changes in urban areas has been demonstrated through many examples over the last two decades. Research has generally focused on the relief phase following a disaster, but we have instead investigated the subsequent phases involving early recovery, recovery, and development. Our aim was to determine to what extent integration of the available tools, techniques, and methods can be used to efficiently monitor the progress of recovery following an earthquake. Changes in buildings within the Italian city of L'Aquila following the 2009 earthquake were identified from Earth observation data and are used as indicators of progress in the recovery process. These changes were identified through (1) visual analysis, (2) automated change detection using a set of decision rules formulated within an object-based image analysis framework, and (3) validation based on a combination of visual and semiautomated interpretations. An accuracy assessment of the automated analysis showed a producer accuracy of 81% (error of omission: 19%) and a user accuracy of 55% (error of commission: 45%). The use of RS made it possible for the identification of changes to be spatially exhaustive, and also to increase the number of categories used for a recovery index. In addition, using RS allowed the area requiring extensive fieldwork (to monitor the progress of the recovery process) to be reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available