4.2 Article

Genome size and climate segregation suggest distinct colonization histories of an orchid species from Neotropical high-elevation rocky complexes

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 456-465

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/bly065

Keywords

chromosome number; environmental predictor; hybrid zone; mixed cytotype population; Neotropics; Orchidaceae; polyploid; Brazil

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brazil [2014/04426-5]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [APQ-02096-14/PPM 00478-16]
  4. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservacao da Biodiversidade [16746]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge about the geographical distribution of cytotypes is crucial to understand the role of polyploidy in diversification. High-elevation rocky complexes (HERCs) are heterogeneous formations found in elevated areas of eastern Brazil. They harbour one of the most endemic floras within the Neotropical region. Yet, we lack knowledge concerning the association of environmental variables and plant cytotypes in this region. Here, we investigate whether the frequency of Zygopetalum mackayi orchid cytotypes is related to climate conditions in the HERCs. We describe chromosome counts, genome size estimates and their association with climate variables for 432 individuals from 19 localities. We show, for the first time, a strong association between climate variation and cytotype variation in a species from the HERCs. We confirm two cytotypes for Z. mackayi (2n = 48 and 2n = 96), which are geographically structured, and describe an intermediate cytotype (2n = 72) restricted to a contact zone. We discuss the implications of our results for chromosome evolution in this species and provide hypotheses for the origin and maintenance of cytotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available