4.7 Article

Mudflat species: Threatened or hidden? An extensive seed bank survey of 108 fish ponds in Southern Germany

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages 154-163

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.024

Keywords

Seed longevity; Soil seed bank; Persistence; Red list species

Funding

  1. Agency of Environment in Baden-Wuerttemberg [PAO 209124.01]
  2. Geschwister Stauder foundation at the University of Hohenheim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mudflats are the most endangered habitats in Central Europe. In Germany, 60% of mudflat plant species are listed as endangered on the national Red List. The main causes are human activities such as the straightening and construction of barrages along large rivers and the abandoning or changing management of fish ponds. Species from ephemeral habitats, such as mudflats, typically have a persistent soil seed bank. However, it has not yet been examined whether mudflat species are still present but hidden in the sediment seed bank. To answer this question, we studied the seed bank of 108 ponds in Southern Germany. More than 300,000 seeds from mudflat species germinated from the sediment samples. Species listed on the national or regional Red Lists were found in all but three ponds, with all ponds containing up to 11 species. Some Red List species were present at very high density (up to nearly 3000 seeds/1). Although the pond locations in this study had been intensively floristically monitored for over half a century some species with > 20 records were determined to be new in two study locations. Based on the last drainage date or record we conclude that seeds of mudflat species may survive between 50 years or even a century. It is, therefore, important that this hidden diversity should be considered in future conservation management practices. Furthermore, Red Lists should revise their entries on species with extremely long-term persistent seed banks by stating that they may be not extinct but hidden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available