4.7 Article

Protecting nature on private land using revolving funds: Assessing property suitability

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 84-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.026

Keywords

Conservation acquisition; Privately Protected Areas; Conservation planning; Conservation buyer; Conservation covenant; Conservation easement; Private land conservation; Property selection; Purchase-protect-resale

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions [CE11001000104]
  2. Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme - Threatened Species Recovery Hub
  3. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  4. ARC Future Fellowship [FT130101225]
  5. National Environmental Science Programme-Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub
  6. Trust for Nature (Victoria)
  7. Nature Foundation SA
  8. Nature Conservation Trust of New South Wales
  9. RMIT University DSC CHEAN A Project [0000019426-05/15]
  10. Australian Research Council [FT130101225] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protecting biodiversity on private land is an important and growing part of global conservation efforts. Revolving funds are used by conservation organisations to buy, resell and permanently protect private land with important ecological values. By reinvesting proceeds from sales in additional properties, revolving funds offer a potentially cost-effective way to protect biodiversity. Their success requires managers to choose properties that can be resold and recover costs, with resale outcomes having consequences for subsequent acquisitions. However, revolving fund property selection is a multi-dimensional decision, influenced by various ecological, social and financial considerations. In conjunction with revolving fund managers, we developed a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to understand which factors they consider to be the most influential on a property's suitability for acquisition, and how much to pay for it. Sensitivity analysis revealed that managers perceive property suitability to be heavily influenced by the threat to the property's ecological values, the acquisition and ongoing management costs, and finding alternative options for protection. Amenity values were seen to heavily influence property resale. Threat and alternative options influence how much to pay, but most influential was the balance of the fund when the purchasing decision is made. Our results suggest managers are taking a low risk approach to property selection. Opportunities may exist to apply revolving funds to higher risk properties otherwise difficult to conserve, provided the need for resale is still met. Ensuring revolving funds target properties with suitable attributes could increase the contribution of this tool to conserving biodiversity on private land.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available