4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Protein threading using residue co-variation and deep learning

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 34, Issue 13, Pages 263-273

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty278

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM089753]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-1564955]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770775, 31671369]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1564955] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1149811] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Template-based modeling, including homology modeling and protein threading, is a popular method for protein 3D structure prediction. However, alignment generation and template selection for protein sequences without close templates remain very challenging. Results: We present a new method called DeepThreader to improve protein threading, including both alignment generation and template selection, by making use of deep learning (DL) and residue co-variation information. Our method first employs DL to predict inter-residue distance distribution from residue co-variation and sequential information (e.g. sequence profile and predicted secondary structure), and then builds sequence-template alignment by integrating predicted distance information and sequential features through an ADMM algorithm. Experimental results suggest that predicted inter-residue distance is helpful to both protein alignment and template selection especially for protein sequences without very close templates, and that our method outperforms currently popular homology modeling method HHpred and threading method CNFpred by a large margin and greatly outperforms the latest contact-assisted protein threading method EigenTHREADER.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available