4.7 Article

Meffil: efficient normalization and analysis of very large DNA methylation datasets

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 34, Issue 23, Pages 3983-3989

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty476

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome [102215/2/13/2]
  3. University of Bristol
  4. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N000498/1]
  5. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/2]
  6. Danish National Research Foundation
  7. Danish Regional Committees
  8. Pharmacy Foundation
  9. Egmont Foundation
  10. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation
  11. Health Foundation
  12. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  13. Lundbeck Foundation
  14. Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit - UK Medical Research Council
  15. Health Foundation [MC_UU_12013/1-9]
  16. BBSRC [BB/I025751/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. ESRC [ES/N000498/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. MRC [MC_UU_00011/1, MC_UU_12013/2, MC_UU_12013/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: DNA methylation datasets are growing ever larger both in sample size and genome coverage. Novel computational solutions are required to efficiently handle these data. Results: We have developed meffil, an R package designed for efficient quality control, normalization and epigenome-wide association studies of large samples of Illumina Methylation BeadChip microarrays. A complete re-implementation of functional normalization minimizes computational memory without increasing running time. Incorporating fixed and random effects within functional normalization, and automated estimation of functional normalization parameters reduces technical variation in DNA methylation levels, thus reducing false positive rates and improving power. Support for normalization of datasets distributed across physically different locations without needing to share biologically-based individual-level data means that meffil can be used to reduce heterogeneity in meta-analyses of epigenome-wide association studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available