4.7 Article

Isoform-level gene expression patterns in single-cell RNA-sequencing data

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 34, Issue 14, Pages 2392-2400

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty100

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden)
  2. Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SERC)-'e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (ecpc)'
  3. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: RNA sequencing of single cells enables characterization of transcriptional heterogeneity in seemingly homogeneous cell populations. Single-cell sequencing has been applied in a wide range of researches fields. However, few studies have focus on characterization of isoform-level expression patterns at the single-cell level. In this study, we propose and apply a novel method, ISOform-Patterns (ISOP), based on mixture modeling, to characterize the expression patterns of isoform pairs from the same gene in single-cell isoform-level expression data. Results: We define six principal patterns of isoform expression relationships and describe a method for differential-pattern analysis. We demonstrate ISOP through analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data from a breast cancer cell line, with replication in three independent datasets. We assigned the pattern types to each of 16 562 isoform-pairs from 4929 genes. Among those, 26% of the discovered patterns were significant (P<0.05), while remaining patterns are possibly effects of transcriptional bursting, dropout and stochastic biological heterogeneity. Furthermore, 32% of genes discovered through differential-pattern analysis were not detected by differential-expression analysis. Finally, the effects of drop-out events and expression levels of isoforms on ISOP's performances were investigated through simulated datasets. To conclude, ISOP provides a novel approach for characterization of isoform-level preference, commitment and heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available