4.7 Article

Integrating proteomic or transcriptomic data into metabolic models using linear bound flux balance analysis

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 34, Issue 22, Pages 3882-3888

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008103]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science) [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [U19AI106772]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI106772] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Transcriptomics and proteomics data have been integrated into constraint-based models to influence flux predictions. However, it has been reported recently for Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, that model predictions from parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA), which does not use expression data, are as good or better than predictions from various algorithms that integrate transcriptomics or proteomics data into constraint-based models. Results: In this paper, we describe a novel constraint-based method called Linear Bound Flux Balance Analysis (LBFBA), which uses expression data (either transcriptomic or proteomic) to predict metabolic fluxes. The method uses expression data to place soft constraints on individual fluxes, which can be violated. Parameters in the soft constraints are first estimated from a training expression and flux dataset before being used to predict fluxes from expression data in other conditions. We applied LBFBA to E.coli and S.cerevisiae datasets and found that LBFBA predictions were more accurate than pFBA predictions, with average normalized errors roughly half of those from pFBA. For the first time, we demonstrate a computational method that integrates expression data into constraint-based models and improves quantitative flux predictions over pFBA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available